Table 1 JBI risk of bias assessment
Cases | Criterias | Overall Appraisal | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Studies included information on age, gender and race | Studies described patient’s history or timelines | The patient presentation on IPH was clearly reported | The assessment methods and diagnostic tests performed, and their results were adequately depicted | Interventions or treatment procedures were clearly described | Describe clearly the post-intervention clinical condition of the patients | Report adverse events after interventions | Relevant take away lessons are reported | ||
Morris et al. [10] - Case 1 | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | UN | N | Included |
Morris et al. [10] - Case 2 | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | UN | N | Included |
Umeyama et al. [11] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | UN | Y | Included |
Kabukari et al. [12] | N | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | UN | Y | Included |
Manuel et al. [13] | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | UN | Y | Included |
Garcia et al. [14] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | UN | Y | Included |
Tsuneyama et al. [15] - Case 1 | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | UN | Y | Included |
Tsuneyama et al. [15] - Case 2 | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | UN | Y | Included |
Kogawa et al. [16] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Included |
Moschos et al. [17] | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | UN | Included |
Takagi et al. [18] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | UN | Y | Included |
Samanta et al. [1] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Included |
Espinosa et al. [19] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | UN | Y | UN | Included |
Kamel et al. [20] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | UN | Y | Included |
Abrams et al. [21] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Included |
Gao et al. [3] | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | Y | Included |
Saigusa et al. [22] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Included |
Yamamoto et al. [23] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | UN | Y | Included |
Colaci et al. [2] | Y | N | N | Y | Y | Y | UN | Y | Included |
Hitawala et al. [24] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | UN | Y | Included |
14 (70%) | 19 (95%) | 18 (90%) | 20 (100%) | 19 (95%) | 17 (85%) | 6 (30%) | 16 (80%) | ||